DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100)
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
e-member
€& MEME
adn
were
you did nat provide a diagnosis and that the severity of your
misconduct outweighed the mitigation of your possible diagnosis.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or Tm Stace ;
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07172-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That diagnosis was confirmed by a board of medical survey The Board found that you were inducted into the Marine Corps on 19 September 1950.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12002-08
In this regard, the Board concluded that the establishment of a more definitive diagnosis of your disability more than. The Board concluded that granting your request would not accord you effective relief because the requested action would mot affect the dissbility rating of 100% you were assigned by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 07976-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2005. In view of the foregoing, the Board concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice for it to delete the diagnosis of a personality disorder from your record, or change your reenlistment code to one that might permit you to reenlist without having to obtain a waiver of your disqualifying psychiatric condition and basis for discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08672-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01590-03
P A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00779-03
00779-03 25 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06714-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03469-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06529-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02878-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. The Board also concluded that given your hostility toward military authority, you are unsuitable for military service, irrespective of the validity of your diagnosis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.